Tuesday, February 18, 2020

LEGAL ASPECTS OF NURSING Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

LEGAL ASPECTS OF NURSING - Essay Example Negligence on either side of the teams gives rise to severe consequences. These consequences are sometimes lethal and several patients have been reported dead on grounds of negligence. Other than filing law suits against the healthcare providers and healthcare facilities, patients and plaintiffs have in the past gone an extra step to sue jurisdictional governments for their failure to make available sufficient funds for up-to-date facilities (Martzo & Sherman 2010, 43). There are a number of federal regulations that health facilities need to observe in assuring client’s safety. The first regulation is the identification of laid down set of measurements of patients’ protection critical to the therapeutic error detection. Another parameter is classifying a set of performances concerning patient safety significant to medical inaccuracy prevention. The third guideline is identifying matters connected to implementation of mandatory reporting for diminution of errors (Martzo & Sherman 2010, 63). Establishing the utmost accommodating way to show information on the incidences of medical oversights to the civic is also a federal law. Healthcare facilities need to take levelheaded steps to ensure that medical workforce adhere to these guidelines by the established modus operandi that encourage patient safety. There are several principles of protecting patients’ safety that applied in Mr. Abraham’s case. First is the Principle of Autonomy. This is the agreement to respect a patient’s right to determine his own course of action. The agreement demands that medical practitioners respect independent decisions made by a patient. Patient Self Determination Act of 1990 passed by the United States Congress reserves a patient’s right to make decisions over what he wants to do with his life. The law, however, applies to a person in a stable state of mind and body (competent person). This principle does not apply to Mr. Abraham’s dema nd to leave the clinic since he was drunk at the time of his admission. His alcohol level was above the legal limit and this disqualified him from the principle of autonomy. The nurses reserved the right to decide on his behalf to stay within the facility for further treatment. The second principle applicable in the case study is the Principle of Beneficence. This states the nurses’ need to be compassionate, take positive action to help others and always desire to do well. This principle is considered the core principle of patient advocacy. In Abraham’s case, the nurses and medical personnel who attended to him had his best interest at heart. After attending to the patient, the nurses restrained Mr. Abraham onto his bed using Posey vest and soft wrist restraints so that he could not leave to cause more harm to himself in another fight. The nurses’ care was evident in their decision to move the patient to a room close to their station so that they could have a cl ose check on him. Further, they devised an hourly visit to ensure his best care. Nonmaleficence is the third principle that applies to the case of Mr. Abraham. This principle demands that medical practitioners may not inflict any harm on the patients as they take positive action to help (Martzo & Sherman 2010, 143). It is the central medical oath of medical ethics. In medical practitioner’s efforts to do utmost good to sustain the patient’

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Dell Inc.s Application of the Direct Sales Model Case Study

Dell Inc.s Application of the Direct Sales Model - Case Study Example The researcher states that Dell, Inc. was revealed to exhibit exemplary financial success in terms of substantial increases in revenue and net profits from 1998 to 2003. Exhibit 4a shows that the market share for Dell in the US PC industry was the highest at 27.6% in 2002 and in worldwide perspectives, Dell’s market share was also indicated to be the highest from among its major PC competitors at 17.1% for the first quarter of 2003. The financial and operating performance of major PC manufacturers, shown in Exhibit 5, show that although IBM and Hewlett Packard (HP) surpassed Dell’s revenues in 2002, their financial ratios, particularly profitability ratios manifested through returns on an asset, investment, and equity all exceeded those posted by all of its major competitors. Further, the net profit margin of IBM was only 2.1% greater than Dell’s 6.3%, as five-year averages ending in September 2003. Dell’s overall sales growth over a five-year period was t he only one posted at more than 20% (at exactly 23.5%) which was significantly greater than any of its major competitors, particularly IBM which only exhibited a five-year growth in sales of 0.7%. Case facts indicate that Dell was ranked fourth as the most admired American company by Fortune magazine due to the direct sales model that they applied and was identified to be instrumental in catapulting Dell into unparalleled heights. Dell’s direct sales model is simply described as the key to the organization’s financial success. The approach enabled the organization to be a producer of personal computers using the most minimal costs and pave the way to dominate the PC industry known for falling prices, which was actually exhibited during the period from 1997 onwards and low-profit margins.